Deirdre Morley, who killed her three children, sues HSE, hospital and consultant

Children’s father Andrew McGinley has also issued medical negligence actions in the High Court

By Shane Phelan

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/deirdre-morley-who-killed-her-three-children-sues-hse-hospital-and-consultant-41261357.html

Deirdre Morley, the mentally ill mother who killed her three children, and her husband Andrew McGinley have both issued medical negligence actions against the HSE in relation to her care.

The Governors of St Patrick’s Hospital in Dublin and a consultant psychiatrist are also named as defendants in separate lawsuits filed with the High Court on Wednesday.

The move comes eight months after Ms Morley, a paediatric nurse, was found not guilty by reason of insanity with the murder of Conor (9), Darragh (7) and Carla McGinley (3) at their home in Newcastle, Co Dublin on January 24, 2020.

The lawsuits were filed after privately commissioned expert reports identified alleged failings in Ms Morley’s care.

Mr McGinley confirmed the issuing of the proceedings when contacted by the Irish Independent.

“This is a process I would much rather not be taking. I just want to understand why my children died,” he said.

After his wife’s trial concluded, Mr McGinley raised a number of concerns and called for an investigation as a matter of urgency into her diagnosis, treatment and medication prior to the tragedy.

Mr McGinley said the result of a preliminary review of his wife’s case by the HSE had not been shared with him.

He said his concerns about his wife’s care had only increased since he was given access to her medical files last September.

“I think anyone who attended at the trial or saw these medical reports would have questions. I sat there and I just had question after question after question that still haven’t been answered,” he said.

Among the issues he has raised is that his wife’s diagnosis prior to the deaths of the children was different from what it was at the end of her trial.

He believes that if her diagnosis at the time of the death of the children was questionable, then so too was her treatment and medication.

Mr McGinley has also said he believes there were a number of occasions during Ms Morley’s professional care where her initial diagnosis should have been queried.

A further issue is his belief that such were the warning signs that would have been seen during his wife’s treatment, they should have warranted the breaching of patient confidentiality to inform him of the extent of her illness.

“Confidentiality should have been breached. But someone chose not to,” he said.

Mr McGinley and his wife have two separate legal teams, but it is thought their cases could run concurrently as they involve the same defendants and are likely to rely on similar material.

Keith Walsh Solicitors is representing Ms Morley while Callan Tansey Solicitors are representing Mr McGinley.

“There are key changes that need to be made. I don’t know, maybe they won’t be made until this case is heard,” said Mr McGinley.

“I am just frustrated. It is two years since the children died and I do not see any discernible change made to how patients are treated for their mental health in Ireland.

“Many people have written to me since I have talked about family inclusion, that they have managed to get their loved ones’ consent to include them in their treatment plans. And yet still they are not included.

“I am trying not to be angry. I don’t want to be angry. I promised the kids I wouldn’t get angry. But here I am two years without them and no closer to understanding why they died.”

The HSE did not have any comment to make in relation to the legal action.

However, it said an independent review was “ongoing”.

“The HSE cannot comment on individual cases when to do so might reveal information resulting in a breach of the ethical requirement on us to observe our duty of confidentiality,” it said in a statement.

Ms Morley’s trial heard she kept the full extent of her illness concealed from those closest to her, including her husband.

She had been on antidepressant drugs for over two years and had previously spent a short period at St Patrick’s in July 2019 after expressing suicidal thoughts.

In the two years before the killings she attended her GP, Clondalkin Mental Health Services, counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy and St Patrick’s.

The court heard that during that time she was prescribed at least five different antidepressant drugs at various stages and the diagnoses she received were less serious than those reached by consultant psychiatrists after the killings, when it was determined she had slipped into delusion and psychosis.

Ms Morley convinced herself her children had been damaged as a result of her mental illness and had no future.

She later expressed regret and remorse but told gardaí she had been unable to stop herself.

Your personal finance questions – I was mugged so can I make a claim on my home insurance?

By Charlie Weston for Independent.ie

https://www.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/your-personal-finance-questions-i-was-mugged-so-can-i-make-a-claim-on-my-home-insurance-41241992.html

Q I was mugged recently and my wallet and my keys, which were in my handbag, were stolen. I have reported it to the Gardaí and cancelled my cards. Because I had my ID and proof of address in my bag, I also had to have all the locks replaced in my home for security purposes. My friend said I might be able to claim the cost of the lock repairs back. It cost me €500 in total.

A In short, it depends on which company you have insurance cover with, according to Billy Shannon of Aviva Insurance Ireland. Different insurance providers may have different levels of cover.

This is why it is important that you look through the policy benefits to ensure they suit your needs before choosing your insurer, or at the very least the minute you have taken out a policy, so that if you want to cancel, you can do so within the 14-day cooling off period, he said.

Mr Shannon added that he would be hopeful whichever insurer you are currently with would offer you some money towards the cost.

At Aviva, if the keys to your home are stolen in a personal assault or break-in, you will be paid up to €400 to cover the cost of replacing outside door locks, locks on domestic safes or alarm keys, he said.

Modern Morals: I broke off my engagement after my fiancé cheated on me. Do I have to return the ring?

By Katie Byrne for Independent.ie

https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/modern-morals-i-broke-off-my-engagement-after-my-fiance-cheated-on-me-do-i-have-to-return-the-ring-41237935.html

Question: I broke off my engagement a few months ago when I discovered my partner of six years had cheated on me. He gave me a ring that cost approximately €10,000 and now he’s demanding I give it back to him.

He took out a loan to pay for the ring so part of me feels that I should give it back. But the other part of me feels like I’m justified in keeping it.

My dad paid a deposit for our wedding venue, which we’re struggling to get returned. Plus, I paid for most of the furnishings and decor in the home that we shared together.

My family says I should consider the ring a small compensation for what I’ve been through, but my ex is now threatening legal action.

What should I do?

Answer: Trying to rebuild your life after a break-up is hard, but trying to rebuild your life after an engagement break-up is even harder. You’re probably craving some privacy right now, but instead, you have to deal with vendors, guests and the ignominy of a very public break-up.

From your letter, I understand you have two questions. Firstly, you want to know what your rights are from a legal perspective and, secondly, you want to know what you should do from an ethical perspective.

For legal advice, I shared your dilemma with Lisa Mc Kenna, Principal Solicitor at Mc Kenna & Co Solicitors.

She says the money spent on a ring cannot be recovered by the person who gifted it unless a loan agreement was drawn up by the giftor and the giftee specifically for its purchase.

“If the loan taken out is in the name of the giftor only, then the loan belongs to him and the giftee has no legal obligation to pay the loan or return the ring that he gave her,” she says.

till, while you’re under no legal obligation to return the ring, we ought to remember that legal and ethical standards are not the same thing.

Common etiquette is often a good guide to ethical behaviour, but in this case, there are no hard-and-fast rules.

Celina Murphy, Editor of online wedding magazine One Fab Day, agrees there’s no definitive answer. “You’re really making up your own rules,” she says.

“In terms of her dad’s investment in the wedding venue deposit, it would be fair to ask her ex to contribute 50pc towards any money that can’t be recouped, as a wedding is a celebration with two people at the centre of it and it follows that the couple should share the expense equally, regardless of whether the wedding is going ahead or not.”

The engagement ring is a trickier matter to decide upon, she says. “On one hand, it was a gift, and, by definition, gifts are given absolutely, with no expectation that they’ll be returned. On the other hand, the ring was a symbol of a marriage that now won’t be going ahead, so the meaning behind it has shifted.”

I also shared your dilemma with Cork-based psychotherapist Tom Evans, who runs Selfcare online counselling. He says he’s hearing your “level-headedness and correct decision-making” in terms of ending the relationship. On that basis, he thinks you should trust your gut here too and “listen to both opposing parts of yourself”.

You’re still grieving the end of your relationship, he points out, and “anger is part and parcel of most grief journeys”.

“There’s a possibility the remaining hurt and consequent anger lies beneath the decision not to return the ring — that it may be an act of passive aggression,” he says.

“I’d suggest taking time to process the remaining hurt and maybe booking a few therapy sessions to help with that. Then she will arrive at a clearer place in mind and body.”

At the same time, he understands why you might consider the ring a form of “compensation”. “It’s utterly reasonable to conclude that she is simply ‘balancing the books’ as they dissolve the relationship and cover all of the costs incurred,” he says.

It’s also worth considering the emotional toll of keeping the ring, says Celina.

“Arguing over the ring will only cause more hurt and make it harder for her to move on, so I’d be inclined to give it back, but only after other financial issues (the venue deposit, the ownership of the home furnishings she paid for) are ironed out.”

I would be of the same mind, but for slightly different reasons. If you decide to keep the ring and trade it in for something else, you will be reminded of this period in your life almost every day for the foreseeable future.

Environmental cues have a huge impact on overall mindset, which is why we should surround ourselves only with objects that trigger happy memories and positive feelings.

Equally, I’d be wary of using the term ‘compensation’, which is synonymous with the word ‘victim’. You were a victim of cheating, yes, but you will recover and heal from this betrayal in time. And you’ll recover a lot faster if you can move beyond the victimhood mindset.